By: Marilyn Ramos
With the Presidential campaigns in full swing, I often think, “Which
party is more animal friendly?” Which
party regularly votes for the betterment of animals’ lives? The answer may be
obvious but I don’t think it is necessarily a simple answer.
I recall attending an animal rights conference in July 2004.
During one of the plenary sessions, the speaker suggested voting for so and so,
a conservative anti-gay Republican who had a pretty decent track record (I wish
I could remember his name) when it came to animals. I was a bit flabbergasted
that this speaker would make such a suggestion. When I challenged him he
responded with “So what?!” He argued
that we should be voting the animals’ interests not our own. Fortunately, the
race we were discussing was not in California where I’m a registered voter so I
didn’t face this dilemma.
Studies have shown that Democratic voters are generally 14 to 19
percentage points more likely than Republican voters to take a pro-animal
rights position. The majority of animal rights activists and vegans I know
(whether personally or just through our movement) lean to the left. The irony,
however, is that in decades past both Republicans and Democrats were both
fighters for civil rights. It has only been recently that the rights movement (women’s
rights, gay rights, voting rights, etc.) seems to be buoyed by more Democratic
leaning voters and Democratic voting Congressmen and women. So does it stand to
reason that it will be Democrats and liberals who will also be in the forefront
of animal rights? I believe so due to the federal congressional voting record
of Republicans and Democrats but I truly hope that this can be changed. It
needs to be changed. The animals need this to change.
In the Senate: 31
Democrats 4 Republicans 1 Independent
(a special shout out goes to Republican Senator
Collins, Independent Senator Sanders and Democratic Senators Blumenthal, Kerry,
Menendez and Reed for scoring 100 or 100+)
In the House: 148
Democrats 19 Republicans
(a special shout out goes to 57 Democratic
representatives for scoring 100 or 100+. No Republican scored 100)
The lopsided numbers in the House are particularly troublesome. We
need to do a better job of outreach to Congress but in particular conservative
right-leaning representatives. I fear that the “animal rights” argument doesn’t
seem to make a difference with a certain segment of conservatives but perhaps a
more forceful argument based on the environment and health is how we can reach
these people.
I also wish that more Republicans and conservatives in the animal
rights movement would “come out of the closet” and make themselves known. I
know it may not be an easy thing to do especially when it seems that 90% of the
movement is liberal. However, I believe the conservatives in our movement have
a duty and have a unique opportunity to do outreach that the rest of us may not
be able to do.
I know that these things are not black and white and that many of
you (like me) might have a dilemma voting for someone who is pro animals but
might be against another position that is important to you. I guess we need to
balance our needs with the animals’ needs and we need to do our homework on
these politicians to determine how entrenched they are in all of their
positions. Are they flexible? Are you flexible?
No comments:
Post a Comment